Robotic cholecystectomy with a new port placement: Is it really beneficial?

OBJECTIVE: This study compared the effect of robotic cholecystectomy (RC) with a new port placement versus that of laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) on surgical pain and postoperative complications. METHODS: We prospectively collected medical data from 100 patients who underwent cholecystectomy (RC = 50, LC = 50) from March 2017 to January 2019. In the RC group, ports were positioned in the left-lower, mid-lower, and umbilical areas. In the LC group, ports were placed in the xiphoid, right-upper, and umbilical areas. RESULTS: Patient characteristics were similar between the two groups. Pain levels at 2, 4, and 8 h were significantly lower in the RC group than in the LC group (p = 0.04, 0.02, and 0.02, respectively). The LC group received more analgesics after surgery (RC = 0.3 ± 0.5 vs. LC = 0.7 ± 0.9, p = 0.03). However, the total medical cost was significantly higher in the RC group (RC = 7355.2 ± 1270.9 USD vs. LC = 4814.8 ± 1572.5 USD, p < 0.01). Mean operative time, length of hospital stay, and postoperative complications were not significantly different between the two groups. CONCLUSION: Regardless of the surgical procedure, postoperative complications were similar. RC with the new port placement can be recommended for patients who are more concerned about postoperative pain, incision, and hospital stay than surgical cost.

Comparing postoperative pain in various pressure pneumoperitoneum of laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a double-blind randomized controlled study.

PURPOSE: This study aims to evaluate the effect of different pneumoperitoneum pressures on postoperative pain, especially by subcategorizing the pressures into 3 groups during laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). METHODS: We conducted a prospective randomized, double-blinded study of 150 patients with benign and uncomplicated gallbladder disease. They were categorized into 3 groups. Each group (50 patients) underwent LC with different pneumoperitoneum methods: group VLP, very-low pressure (6-8 mmHg); group LP, low pressure (9-11 mmHg); and group SP, standard pressure (12-14 mmHg). The 3 groups were compared for pain intensity, duration, analgesic requirement, and complications. RESULTS: The characteristics of the patients were similar among all groups. Postoperative pain scores at each time point (1, 2, 4, 6, 12, 24, and 48 hours) were not significantly different among the 3 groups. Further, operation time, hospital stay, the number of analgesic consumption doses, and postoperative complications were not significantly different among the 3 groups. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates no difference in postoperative pain among various pneumoperitoneum pressures during LC. Therefore, routine use of lower-pressure pneumoperitoneum is not recommended unless in selected patients who require low-pressure pneumoperitoneum surgery.